Ethanol Production from Starch by Hydrolysis and Fermentation
Bhaskar G. Gaikwad1*, Varda V.
Kolapkar2 and Manasi Shrouti3
1C.E. Division, National Chemical
Laboratory, Pune-411008, India
2Department of Biotechnology, Dr. D.Y. Patil
B.B.I., Tathawade, Pune
3 Department of
Biotechnology, Modern College of Arts, Science & Commerce, Ganeshkhind, Pune
*Corresponding Author E-mail: bg.gaikwad@ncl.res.in
ABSTRACT:
At present amylase
is used for
hydrolysis of starch
before alcohol fermentation. Ethanol production
from starch after
hydrolysis of starch by
acid was studied in
this paper. Hydrochloric
acid was
used for hydrolysis. Different acid concentration
and time were
used for hydrolysis. We have
used four substrates:
soluble starch, insoluble starch,
jwar (sorghum)
and sweet potato.
Jwar (sorghum)
and sweet potato
are starchy substrates
available in plenty.These substrates
we have used. We
observed 92.79% hydrolysis
with 13.33% soluble starch, 16.66% HCl concentration
for 30 minutes. We observed 96.51%
hydrolysis of insoluble
starch (14.28%) by 20.63% HCl when 20 minutes
heating time was
used. In case of
jwar we
found 69.23% hydrolysis
where 17.85% jwar
(sorghum) was treated
with 20.63% HCl for 30
minutes heating. We got 62.08%
hydrolysis for 14.28% sweet potato
starch treated with 20.63%
HCl for
30 minutes heating. pH
adjustment of hydrolyzate was
studied. NaOH,
NaOH with potassium
phosphate for buffering
action, calcium hydroxide,
calcium carbonate were
studied for pH adjustment. These hydrolyzate were
subjected to fermentation
after adjusting pH. Baker’s
yeast was used
for fermentation. Fermentation
was carried out at
temperature 280C without shaking
for 24h. We
have obtained 4.37, 4.57 and
3.61% ethanol from
fermentation soluble starch,
insoluble starch and jwar (sorghum) hydrolyzate respectively.
KEYWORDS: Starch, Jwar, Bakers’ yeast, fermentation,
hydrolysis, hydrochloric acid.
INTRODUCTION:
Starch
is produced from
plant source. It is abundant in nature. It is mainly used for edible purpose.
Some portion is also used for liquor production. It
is observed that
lot of quantity of starch
is not utilized,
goes in waste. Sometimes it is
not of edible quality due to various
reasons. Such starch can be utilized
for alcohol production. Presently
amylase is used
routinely in for
hydrolysis of starch1,2 . Amylase is
expensive and not available
everywhere. Acid hydrolysis can
be done in
simpler way. Study of
hydrolysis of starch
by acid is reported
in literature by
many researchers3-5. Some
researchers have hydrolyzed
starch by acid,
amylase and used for
fermentation. In this
research work, we
have attempted to
optimize acid hydrolysis
followed by fermentation by
bakers’ yeast. We
have used hydrochloric
acid for hydrolysis
and hydolyzate arising
is used for
alcohol production using
baker’s yeast.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Chemicals:
Ethanol was purchased from Thomas Baker Mumbai.
Other chemicals were purchased from S.D. Fine Chemicals, Mumbai.
Remaining material was purchased from local
market.
Cultures:
Bakers’ yeast was purchased from
local market.
Analysis of
sugars :
Sugar
is analyzed by DNSA reagent6. Samples
of acid hydrolysis
were neutralized by NaOH and analyzed.
Analysis of
Ethanol
Ethanol
was estimated by
dichromate method7
Hydrolysis of starch:
Starch
was weighed. Distilled
water was added
and mixed well.
Hydrochloric acid is
added. Mixture was
heated in boiling
water bath for
different time. Sugar was
estimated by DNSA
method.
Fermentation:
Hydrolyzate
was brought to pH
5.5. 5% . Bakers’ yeast was added
and fermentation was
carried out at 280C for
24h. Sugar and
ethanol were analyzed.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Starch concentration
Soluble
starch was subjected
to acid hydrolysis.
We have tried
different concentrations. But
we observed higher
concentrations are not
useful. 13.33% soluble
starch is suitable
for study. In case of
jwar starch increasing
substrate concentration is
not useful. 14.28 % concentration is
useful (table 1). We observed
62.08% hydrolysis where 14.28%
sweet potato starch
treated with 20.63%
HCl
for 30 minutes heating.
We got lower results when
substrate concentration was
increased to 17.46%.
Table 1:
Effect of concentration
of starch : soluble starch,
jwar
starch.
Starch |
Starch % |
HCl% |
Time (Minutes) |
Hydrolysis % |
Soluble starch |
13.33 |
16.66 |
20 |
65.88 |
15 |
16.66 |
20 |
69.90 |
|
16.66 |
16.66 |
20 |
61.61 |
|
Jwar starch |
14.28 |
20.63 |
30 |
62.88 |
17.85 |
20.63 |
30 |
69.23 |
Acid concentration
We
have used 16.66 and
19.35% HCl for
hydrolysis of soluble starch
(13.33%) (figure1). 14.51% insoluble
starch used for
study. 19.35 and 20.63% HCl
concentrations were used ( figure 1).
Figure 1: Effect
of concentration of HCl and time
on hydrolysis of
soluble, insoluble starch
and jwar
Soluble starch 13.33%: B- HCl 16.66%, 10 min.; C- HCl
19.35%, 10 min.; D-HCl 16.66% 20
minutes; E-HCl
19.35%, 20 minutes heating time.
Inoluble
starch 14.28%: F- HCl 19.35%, 10 minutes; G- HCl 20.63, 10 minutes; H-HCl
19.35% 20
minutes; I-HCl 20.63%, 20 minutes heating time.
Jwar : starch 14.28% 30 minutes:
J- HCl
20.63; K- HCl 21.87%
We observed
increase in hydrolysis by
increasing concentration. Insoluble
starch was studied
for higher concentration
with higher concentration of HCl where 96.51%
hydrolysis was observed
with 20.63% HCl for 20
minutes. Acid hydrolysis of jwar was studied
and we found there
is not much differnce in hydrolysis
when 20.63 and 21.87% HCl (figure
1). In
case of sweet potato,
although we have
increased HCl concentartion i.e. 23.72
and 25%, we had
lower hydrolysis i.e. 53.04
and 40.25% respectively.
Hydrolysis time:
We
observed 92.79% hydrolysis
with 13.33% soluble
starch, 16.66% HCl
concentration for 30 minutes (figure 2). Whereas 90.95% hydrolysis
was observed for
insoluble starch. In
case of jwar we
found 69.23% hydrolysis where 17.85%
jwar
was treated with
20.63% HCl for 30 minutes heating (figure 3). We observed 62.08% hydrolysis
where 14.28% sweet potato
starch treated with
20.63% HCl for 30
minutes heating.
Figure 2: Effect of hydrolysis time
on acid hydrolysis
of soluble starch.
Figure 3: Effect of hydrolysis time
on insoluble -starch and jwar-starch
hydrolysis
Insoluble starch
13.33% ; HCl 16.66%
Jwar
starch 14.28%; HCl 20.63%
Figure
4: Ethanol from
soluble, insoluble and jwar (sorghum) starch.
Fermentation:
Soluble
starch (13.33% starch, 16.66% HCl, 30 minutes heating);
insoluble starch (1428% starch, 20.63%
HCl , 20 min. heating) were
hydrolyzed. In case
of jwar
we have used 14.28% starch, 20.63% HCl, 30 minutes heating because using
higher HCl concentration, substrate
and time not
much improvement was
observed in hydrolysis. pH of hydrolyzate was
adjusted to 5.5
by NaOH but
we found buffering
is necessary. Therefore we have
used 0.003M K2HPO4 before
adjusting pH. Afterward
we have tried
CaCO3 for adjusting
pH.
Fermentation of hydrolyzate
arising from soluble
starch, insoluble starch
and jwar starch
was done using
5% baker’s yeast
at 280C for 24h (table 2). Results
of alcohol are
presented in figure 4.
Osemwengie
and Omorodion
(2013)8 have reported
glucose preparation from
cassava starch by
acid hydrolysis. Cao et al.
(2014)1, Preez
et al. (1985)2 have studied
ethanol fermentation of
sorghum where they
have used amylase for
hydrolysis. Muller and Miller (1983)9 have
produced sugar from
starch using acid
hydrolysis at high temperature
and pressure where hydrolyzate
used for ethanol
preparation. Monsalve
et al. (2006)10 have
produced ethanol from
cassava where they
have used sulphuric acid
for hydrolysis. Scholz et al. (2012)11 studied alcohol production
from algal mass
where sulphuric acid
was used for
hydrolysis. Some literature survey
is cited in table 3.
Although we have got
less alcohol, we
are reporting simple
process for production
of alcohol. The present
work will be
useful in developing
feasible technology at
higher scale where
we can have
patent.
Table
2: Hydrolysis
and ferrmentation of
starch
Starch |
Starch (%) |
HCl (%) |
Time (minutes) |
Hydrolysis (%) |
Sugar utilization in
fermentation (%) |
Ethanol formation efficiency |
soluble |
13.33 |
16.66 |
30 |
92.01 |
89.29 |
84.33 |
insoluble |
14.28 |
20.63 |
20 |
96.51 |
87.59 |
71.08 |
jwar |
14.28 |
20.63 |
30 |
62.86 |
85.79 |
76.58 |
Table 3:
Literature survey
Substrate |
Acid (%) |
Conditions |
Hydrolysis
(%) |
References |
Pinho
starch, corn starch |
10.8% HCl |
25% starch, 440C 6h |
solubility
increased |
Thys
et al. (2013)3 |
Algal biomass |
H2SO4 |
30%
biomass, 1210C |
Hydrolysis till no
further breakdown |
Scholz
et al. (2013)11 |
Dioscorea alata
starch |
8% HCl |
3.3%
starch, 350C, 32 days |
63.66 |
Jiang et al. (2012)4 |
Quick sweet
starch Normal sweet
potato |
8.04%
HCl |
1.5%
starch, 370C, 16-18 days |
85 50 |
Genkina
et al. (2009)5 |
Cassava |
0.8
pH by H2SO4 |
17%
starch, 5h |
100 |
Monsalve et al. (2006)10 |
Bakery waste |
2% H2SO4 |
1320C,
40 min. |
92 |
Choi
and Mathews (1996)12 |
CONCLUSION:
We
observed 92.79% hydrolysis
with 13.33% soluble starch, 16.66% HCl concentration
for 30 minutes heating. By
increasing starch (soluble) concentration
hydrolysis was not
increased. By increasing acid concentartion, hydrolysis
of soluble and insoluble
starch increased. For 13.33 %
insoluble starch we have not
tried more acid concentration
because already such
study was done
for soluble starch.
We observed 96.51%
hydrolysis of insoluble
starch (14.28%) by 20.63% HCl when 20 minutes
heating time was
used. In case
of jwar we
found 69.23% hydrolysis where
17.85% jwar
was treated with
20.63% HCl for 30
minutes heating. We got 62.08%
hydrolysis for 14.28% sweet
potato starch treated
with 20.63% HCl with
30 minutes heating. We
have obtained 4.37, 4.57 and 3.61%
ethanol from soluble,
insoluble and jwar starch
respectively.
REFERENCES:
1.
Cao W,
Liu R, Sun C and
Mei X . Co-fermentation of
stalk juice and
clarified grain mash
of sweet sorghum for ethanol
production. Energy Sources, Part A.
36; 2014:914–921.
3.
Fletcher PJ. and Staden J F van.
Determination of ethanol
in distilled liquors
using sequential injection
analysis with
spectrophotometric
detection. Analyica
Chimica Acta 499; 2003: 123-128.
4.
Genkina NK, Kiseleva VI
and Noda T. Comparative
investigation on acid
hydrolysis of sweet potato
starches with different amylopectin chain-length.
Starch/Stärke
61; 2009: 321–325.
5.
Jiang Q,
Gao W,
Li X, Shi Y, Guo
L and
Xiao P. The effect
of acid and glucoamylase hydrolysis on
partial physicochemical
properties and characteristics of Dioscorea alata Linn. Starch.
Starch/Sta¨ rke 64;
2012: 813–820
6.
Miller GL. Use
of dinitrosalicylic acid
reagent for determination
of reducing sugar.
Analytical Chemistry. 31(3); 1959:
426-428.
7.
Muller WC and Miller FD. Fermentable
sugar from hydrolysis of
carbohydrate polymer. U.S. Pat.
4421856, Dec. 20, 1983.
8. Monsalve G, John F, Medina de P, Victoria I, Ruiz
C and Angela A. Ethanol production
from banana peels
and cassava starch. Dyna (Medellin
Colombia) 150; 2006:
21-27.
9.
Osemwengie S O
and Omorodion S N E.
A study
of the production
of glucose syrup
from cassava starch
using acid hydrolysis and
the preservation using
sodium bisulfite’. in
Advanced Materials Research
(Edited by Ibhadode AOA
and Aluyor EO.),
824; 2013: 347-353. Publisher: Trans Tech
Publications Ltd, Switzerland
10. Preez JC du, Jong FD, Botes PJ and Lategan PM. Fermentation alcohol
from grain sorghum
starch. Biomass 8(2); 1985:
101-117.
11.
Scholz M J, Riley MR
and Cuello JL.
Acid hydrolysis and
fermentation of microalgal starches
to ethanol by the
yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomass
& Bioenergy 48;
2013: 59-65.
12.
Thys RCS,
Aires AG, Marczak LDF
and Norena CPZ. The
effect of acid
hydrolysis on the
technological functional
properties of pinhã o (Araucaria
brasiliensis)
starch.. Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment.,
Campinas 33 (Supl.
1); 2013: 89-94.
Received
on 05.12.2014 Modified on 21.01.2015
Accepted
on 28.01.2015 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Research J. Science and Tech. 7(1):
Jan.-Mar. 2015; Page 14-18
DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2015.00003.0